On 17th November, the UK Supreme Court (UKSC) issued its decision in the conjoined appeals of Keir and Daly v His Majesty’s Advocate ([2025] UKSC 38).
Over recent years, the defence have been faced by an ever-restrictive regime whereby evidence and lines of inquiry have been dismissed as collateral or prohibited by the “rape shield” provisions. The UKSC’s decision provides the potential to revisit how cases with sexual allegations are conducted. In particular, the Court was concerned with whether this current practice was compatible with the accused’s right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).
Though the appeals were refused due to both accused being deemed to have received fair trials, in a judgment that is of considerable importance to Scottish practice, the UKSC held that the current approach of the High Court is liable to lead to unfairness and, as a result, will require modification.
In light of the concerns expressed by the Supreme Court, it will be for the Scottish Courts to reconsider their approach to sensitive evidence in criminal trials. And trial judges will likely have an enhanced role in considering whether the relevance and admissibility of any proposed evidence.
This could also have profound implications for cases currently being prepared for trial, trials currently in progress, and for those convicted of sexual offences, who may now take steps to appeal their convictions. At Levy & McRae we work tirelessly to ensure that we are at the forefront of legal developments to ensure that we consider all angles of such cases.
